Yes you can. Use the
WFI_img_acq_MoveToGap template.
You can figure out the
x,y of your pixel using the diagram and
table of the WFI mosaic.
Remember, for Service Mode
observations, you need to clearly mark the star you are talking about
and give us the coordinates where you want it!
Yes you can. Use the
WFI_img_acq_MoveToGap template.
You can figure out the
x,y of your pixel using the diagram and
table of the WFI mosaic.
Remember, for Service
Mode observations, you need to clearly indicate the star you are
talking about. It will be moved to the closest gap (unless specified
otherwise).
The pointing is currently centred such that your target object will fall on pixel (4150,3950). This is in the top right-hand corner of chip 7. The pointing of the telescope is good to within 10 arcsec.
This really depends on how big your offsets are and whether you choose
Combined Offsets = True. If you choose Combined Offsets =
True, the success of the combined offset depends on exactly where
we have managed to find a guide star on the tracker chip, and exactly
how big your offset is.
I would suggest you set Combined
Offsets = False if you plan to do large offsets. This means we
will have to choose a new guide star after each offset (overhead
1 minute each time), but inevitably we will save
time doing things this way, rather than having to abort and restart
your OB again when the guiding fails.
As you can see from the table of overheads for WFI, by far the biggest overhead which can be avoided is that involved in changing filters. Therefore, the easiest way to minimise overheads is to minimise filter changes.
Yes you can (Note: for Service Mode
observations, you MUST get a Phase
II Waiver approved first). However, we don't encourage this
practice since the weather conditions at La Silla are not stable over
long periods of time. In particular, the seeing can vary widely over
the space of an hour. For examples of how the seeing can vary during
the night, look at some of the recent plots from the La Silla DIMM.
So
if you request good seeing (<1 arcsec), your OBs have a better chance
of being executed fully within constraints if you keep your OBs short!
Yes there is. You can pick up this OB from MAKE OB AND PUT SOMEWHERE. You can import this directly into your P2PP and change as you need, but this gives you the offsets required.
Starting in Period 71, only the following filters form part of the Standard Calibration Plan:
For more information on the Standard Calibration Plan for Service Mode observations, please click here.
We do not normally mount special filters (or even filters from other ESO sets) in the ESO WFI. However, you may state your case and ask ls-wfi@eso.org whether it would be possible. If they agree, the filters must be provided to La Silla at least 2 months before the start of the observations.
There is certainly fringing in the Ic/Iwp filter. A detailed report about the fringing patter in this filter is available here. So far we do not know how variable the pattern is. The intensity varies a lot, but the shape seems to be quite stable. We plan to do more measurements in the near future to clarify this point.
I'm sure there are many piplines floating around to reduce WFI data, however, none of them are publicly available. That being said, there are many packages that exist to reduce mosaic data. At the very least there is:
The FITS files produced by ESO instruments make extensive use of hierarchical keywords. While these are standard FITS, IRAF cannot deal with them. To convert these keywords (e.g. from HIERARCH ESO TEL AIRM START to AIRMASS) use the hierarch28 program developed by N. Devillard. This program, together with a series of other useful FITS-related programs, is available at the ESO standalone fits tools webpage. These tools are part of the ECLIPSE package, and therefore directly available at the telescope and on any scisoft machine.
Alternatively, you can download the ESOWFI package for IRAF to help you out.