===============================================================================
         DOCUMENTATION REVIEW PROCEDURE - COMMENT LIST  
===============================================================================
Date     : 22/03/1999
Document : Auxiliary Telescope System
	   Hardware Design Description
	   Preliminary Design Review Second Part 
           VLT-TRE-ESO-15154-174x - Draft 1 - 15/03/1999
Author(s): M.Duchateau

===============================================================================
General comment
(PDU) This document is built around a copy of document VLT-ICD-ESO-15100-1528,
Issue 3.0, thus should refer to it instead of duplicating information (actually quite a lot! that is not maintenable). 

---001-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PDU)Section 3.1 - LAN layout
Check with VLT-SPE-ESO-17120-1355, Issue 1.2 for detailed layout conforming 
the VLT Control LAN layout.
I suggest here to use the appropriate terminology and naming conventions for 
all the nodes.

---002-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PDU) Section 3.4 - Configuration Item
From the schematis shown page 10, you are referencing the VME boards 
VMIVME VMIVME 4118 for which I have not found any functional justification.

You have indexed the MAC4 boards, why not the others, or none?

---003-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PDU) Section 3.4 - Configuration Item
On the Auxiliary LCU, you have added the 2 items TBDB and LAN equipment
that do not appear on the other LCUs. Is there a reason for?
Remember that the Aux LCU is not equipped with TIM.

---004-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PDU) Section 3.4 - Configuration Item
On the LCU, you mention the item UPS distribution. Is it compliant with the
proposal made by AMOS?

---005-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PDU) Section 4.1 - Control function allocation
I do not think that this issue is of the HW ressort. The evaluation of the
computing power is an issue to be studied by the SW group for the PDR.

---006-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(PDU) Chapter 4
You do not provide additional information vs the ICD.