Title Chemical-dynamical couplings and meteorology in Titan's atmosphere Pi E. Lellouch Time 160 hrs 1. Name of program and authors Title: Chemical-dynamical couplings and meteorology in Titan's atmosphere Authors: E. Lellouch 2. One short paragraph with science goal(s) Abstract: Titan's atmosphere, rich in hydrocarbons, nitriles and oxygenated compounds, is the place for strong chemical-dynamical couplings at these species exhibit strong seasonal variability, are influenced by the global circulation patterns, and participate in the atmospheric thermal balance. ALMA will map at 0.2" species such as CO, HCN, HC3N, CH3CN. Search for new species like CH3CCH, CH2NH, DCN, CxHyCN etc... will be performed. Stratospheric winds will be measured and thermal profiles retrieved in all strong lines. In additon, continuum measurements at a series of frequencies will allow one to map the tropospheric temperature and possible methane humidity. 3. Number of sources : 1 Titan (satellite) 4. Coordinates: 4.1. Rough RA and DEC variable 4.2. Moving target: yes. Satellite ephemerides need to be implemented. 4.3. Time critical: yes (seasonal variability will be investigated) 4.4. Scheduling constraints: (optional) 5. Spatial scales: 5.1. Angular resolution (arcsec): 0.2" 5.2. Range of spatial scales/FOV (arcsec): 0.8" (optional: indicate whether single-field, small mosaic, wide-field mosaic...) 5.3. Required pointing accuracy: 0.2" 6. Observational setup 6.1. Single dish total power data: no Observing modes for single dish total power: (e.g., nutator switch; frequency switch; position switch; on-the-fly mapping; and combinations of the above) 6.2. Stand-alone ACA: no 6.3. Cross-correlation of 7m ACA and 12m baseline-ALMA antennas: beneficial 6.4. Subarrays of 12m baseline-ALMA antennas: no 7. Frequencies: 7.1. Receiver band: Band 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 7.2. Lines and Frequencies (GHz): CO: 230, 345 GHz HCN: 354 GHz H2O: 183 and/or 325 GHz HDO: 226, 464 GHZ HC3N,CH3CN: 255 GHz TBD molecular searches near 250, 350, 650 GHz 7.3. Spectral resolution (km/s): 0.05 km/s 7.4. Bandwidth or spectral coverage (km/s or GHz): 2 GHz for broad CO, HCN lines. 0.5 GHz may be sufficient for other trace species. 8. Continuum flux density: 8.1. Typical value (Jy): 80 K (take average value of set of objects) (optional: provide range of fluxes for set of objects) 8.2. Required continuum rms (Jy or K): 0.01 K 8.3. Dynamic range within image: (from 7.1 and 7.2, but also indicate whether, e.g., weak objects next to bright objects) 8.4. Calibration requirements: absolute 1-3% repeatability 1-3% relative 1-3% 9. Line intensity: 9.1. Typical value (K or Jy): 3 K - 30 K (take average value of set of objects) (optional: provide range of values for set of objects) 9.2. Required rms per channel (K or Jy): 0.5 K 9.3. Spectral dynamic range: 9.4. Calibration requirements: absolute 5 % repeatability 1-3% relative 1-3% 10. Polarization: no 10.1. Required Stokes parameters: 10.2. Total polarized flux density (Jy): 10.3. Required polarization rms and/or dynamic range: 10.4. Polarization fidelity: 10.5. Required calibration accuracy: 11. Integration time for each observing mode/receiver setting (hr): Typically 10 hours per line. Wind measurements will be repeated a few (4) times to search for seasonal variability. 12. Total integration time for program (hr): About 160 hours 13. Comments on observing strategy : (optional) (e.g. line surveys, Target of Opportunity, Sun, ...): -------------------------------------------------- Review v2.0: Review 4.1.1-4.1.8 The only question I have with regards to these projects is the use of ACA cross-correlated with ALMA-12m. Several projects list this option as 'required' or as 'beneficial', but no arguments are given. - When listed as 'required' does this mean that the observations are mosaics, and that the ACA is needed to provide the intermediate scales? If so, are the cross-correlations with the ALMA-12m antennas needed, or could simultaneous ACA-7m-only observations also suffice? - When listed as 'beneficial' is this purely for S/N reasons or also for uv-coverage? The cross-correlation option is fairly demanding on the scheduling, and unlikely to be used unless absolutely necessary.