Title Io's volcanism Pi E. Lellouch Time 100 hrs 1. Name of program and authors Title: Io's volcanism Authors: E. Lellouch 2. One short paragraph with science goal(s) Abstract: Io's atmosphere is dominated by active volcanism that directly injects species like SO2, SO, NaCl into the atmosphere. This atmosphere shows unique spatial and temporal variability, which remains poorly characterized. ALMA can map the detected species, measure Doppler shifts that are due to planetary-wide circulation regimes, to plasma interactions, or to volcanic plume injection, and search for many new potential atmospheric molecules (OCS, S2O, KCl, Cl0...) as well as determine chlorine and sulfur isotopic ratios. All this bears implications on the composition of ionian lavae, magmas and interior. 3. Number of sources : 1 Io (satellite) 4. Coordinates: 4.1. Rough RA and DEC variable 4.2. Moving target: yes. Satellite ephemerides need to be implemented. 4.3. Time critical: yes (need to observe Io sufficiently away from Jupiter) 4.4. Scheduling constraints: (optional) 5. Spatial scales: 5.1. Angular resolution (arcsec): 0.2" 5.2. Range of spatial scales/FOV (arcsec): 1.2" (optional: indicate whether single-field, small mosaic, wide-field mosaic...) 5.3. Required pointing accuracy: 0.2" 6. Observational setup 6.1. Single dish total power data: no Observing modes for single dish total power: (e.g., nutator switch; frequency switch; position switch; on-the-fly mapping; and combinations of the above) 6.2. Stand-alone ACA: no 6.3. Cross-correlation of 7m ACA and 12m baseline-ALMA antennas: beneficial 6.4. Subarrays of 12m baseline-ALMA antennas: no 7. Frequencies: 7.1. Receiver band: Band 6, 7 7.2. Lines and Frequencies (GHz): Many lines at 1.3 mm and 0.8 mm 7.3. Spectral resolution (km/s): 0.05 km/s 7.4. Bandwidth or spectral coverage (km/s or GHz): 30 km/s is sufficient to correct for orbital motions of Io. Large bandwidth (up to several GHz) is desirable to optimize serendipitous line searches. 8. Continuum flux density: 8.1. Typical value (Jy): 100 K (take average value of set of objects) (optional: provide range of fluxes for set of objects) 8.2. Required continuum rms (Jy or K): 0.1 K 8.3. Dynamic range within image: (from 7.1 and 7.2, but also indicate whether, e.g., weak objects next to bright objects) 8.4. Calibration requirements: absolute 10 % repeatability 5 % relative 5 % 9. Line intensity: 9.1. Typical value (K or Jy): 2 K - 30 K (take average value of set of objects) (optional: provide range of values for set of objects) 9.2. Required rms per channel (K or Jy): 0.5 K 9.3. Spectral dynamic range: 9.4. Calibration requirements: absolute 5 % repeatability 1-3% relative 1-3% 10. Polarization: no 10.1. Required Stokes parameters: 10.2. Total polarized flux density (Jy): 10.3. Required polarization rms and/or dynamic range: 10.4. Polarization fidelity: 10.5. Required calibration accuracy: 11. Integration time for each observing mode/receiver setting (hr): Typically 10 hours per line. 12. Total integration time for program (hr): About 100 hours 13. Comments on observing strategy : (optional) (e.g. line surveys, Target of Opportunity, Sun, ...): If a volcanic "event" occurs, it could be a ToO. -------------------------------------------------- Review v2.0: Review 4.1.1-4.1.8 The only question I have with regards to these projects is the use of ACA cross-correlated with ALMA-12m. Several projects list this option as 'required' or as 'beneficial', but no arguments are given. - When listed as 'required' does this mean that the observations are mosaics, and that the ACA is needed to provide the intermediate scales? If so, are the cross-correlations with the ALMA-12m antennas needed, or could simultaneous ACA-7m-only observations also suffice? - When listed as 'beneficial' is this purely for S/N reasons or also for uv-coverage? The cross-correlation option is fairly demanding on the scheduling, and unlikely to be used unless absolutely necessary.