![]() |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FORS1:
|
|||||
|
QC1
PLOTS ZEROPOINTS: per frame
per night | |
QC1 ASCII DATA: | |
QC1 database (expert mode): zp_frame | zp_night |
*: use "any" for data until 2002-10-01, as there is no chip id in the database for old data. |
Do not use these zeropoints for science
data. They are reduced assuming standard extinction coefficients
which may not be appropriate for an individual night! The night
zero points are determined applying extinction coefficients and colour
terms which are read from the QC1
Database. The coefficients are updated after every period and may
cause jumps of up to 0.1 mag in the night zeropoints, if large changes
occur.
Photometric zeropoints have been calculated
starting from exposures of standard stars taken from the Landolt
catalogue (Landolt 1992, AJ 104, 340). There are two
kinds of zeropoints - per
frame and per
night. For the zero points per frame the average of the zeropoints
from the individual stars is determined. Zeropoints fainter than this
average by more than 0.3 mag are excluded and the average is
re-determined. For the zeropoints per night a pre-selection is done:
If there are more than 3 stars in a given field, a
linear regression of zeropoint versus colour is obtained. Stars
deviating by more than 1 sigma (uncertainty of fit) from this relation
are discarded. Then all stars reamining for that night are used to
determine the zero point for the night.
Average zeropoints
for the previous periods can be found here; older ones are
given here
The raw data have been:
Before 1999-12-11, a different method has been used, the adaptive
aperture method using "first moments". This gives
magnitudes which are systematically lower by about 0.06 mags or
more. The fluxes are then
converted from ADU per sec intoelectrons per sec. The
conversion factors are averaged over the four CCD ports and are read
from the FITS keywords "HIERARCH ESO DET OUTi CONAD" with i = 1...4 .
All steps above are performed automatically using the
FORS1+2 pipeline.
The final zeropoints are obtained applying standard extinction
coefficients and colour coefficients.
Zeropoints tables and plots can be accessed from the above
interface. Currently, only zeropoint values obtained from observations
performed with the Standard Resolution (SR) collimator are
trended.
The extinction coefficients and colour terms used for the determination of frame zeropoints can be
found here.
Detailed colour terms and extinction coefficients have been
derived. Click here
for a description and results.
General
The SExtractor
(Source Extractor) software see, Bertin & Arnouts
1996 (A&A 117, 393) is run on the reduced images,
to detect standard stars and to extract their fluxes. A fixed
aperture of 10" radius is used.
Zeropoints trending
We warn the users that the zeropoints have been computed using
constant extinction coefficients and color terms, with the
purpose of instrument and site performance monitoring only. Though
they are reasonably precise, they should not be used for accurate
photometric calibrations.
Colour terms
and extinction coefficients
Paranal sky transparency
Starting
with March 2001, a prototype of the
ASM LINE OF SIGHT SKY ABSORPTION MONITOR (LOSSAM) has been implemented and
made available. After clicking the button, select the month and the date of interest.
Photometric stability |
![]()
|
In this plot we show the behavior of
the U_BESSEL zeropoints computed for ANTU+FORS1 in the period Feb-Dec
2000, which starts just after an ANTU-M1 re-aluminization. The dotted
line is a least squares fit to the full data set, while the solid line
is the result of the fitting after a 1 sigma clipping. The rejected
points are plotted as empty circles. Here we implicitely assume that
the remaining points were obtained in photometric conditions. A
clear trending is visible, which can be explained as an eficiency loss
in the main mirror reflectivity. Similar behaviors are visible also in
BVR and I, with smaller slopes. In the case of U passband, the
zeropoint decrease rate is as high as 0.13 mag/year, which implies
an efficiency loss of more than 10% in one
year. This loss has been significantly reduced by cleaning the mirror in between re-coatings. |