[Top] [Prev] [Next] [Bottom]

22.1 Calibration Goals

STIS is a new and complex instrument. As of the date of this Data Handbook, our understanding of STIS as an instrument, as well as our development and optimization of the pipeline calibration for STIS (both the software and the reference files) is at an early stage.

In Table 22.1 through Table 22.5, we publish the calibration goals for Cycle 7. These are the accuracies we aim to provide to users by the end of Cycle 7 for data taken in supported modes at any time during Cycle 7. That is, at the end of Cycle 7, if you use the most up to date calstis calibration software and the most appropriate reference files to recalibrate your data, then these are the accuracies we aim to be able to provide. In the interim, as we obtain and process the on-orbit calibration data needed to produce the reference files to support this level of calibration accuracy, and as we improve the calibration software in tandem, the level of accuracy you will receive in your data will be different (lower) than these values. Information about the accuracies obtainable at any one time and about data foibles will be regularly posted to the STIS WWW page and announced in Space Telescope Analysis Newsletters (STANs) sent via E-mail to the STIS community (see below).



CCD Spectroscopic Accuracies

Attribute

Accuracy

Limiting Factors

Relative wavelengths-within an exposure

0.1-0.25 pixels

Stability of optical distortion

Absolute wavelengths-across exposures

1.0 pixels

· Thermal stability

· Internal versus external illumination

· Derivation of wavecal zero point

Absolute photometry

10%

Instrument stability and photometric calibration

Relative photometry (within an exposure)

5%

Instrument stability and photometric calibration



MAMA Spectroscopic Accuracies

Attribute

Accuracy

Limiting Factor

Relative wavelengths-within an exposure

0.25-0.5 pixels

Stability of small scale geometric detector + optical distortion

Absolute wavelengths-across exposures

1.0 pixels

· Thermal stability

· Internal versus external stability

· Derivation of wavecal zero point

Absolute photometry

15%

Instrument stability and calibration

Relative photometry (within an exposure)

5-10%

Instrument stability/flat fields



CCD Imaging Accuracies

Attribute

Accuracy

Limiting Factor

Relative astrometry-within an image

0.1 pixels

Stability of optical distortion

Absolute photometry

5-10%

Instrument stability

Relative photometry within an image

5%

External illumination pattern



MAMA Imaging Accuracies

Attribute

Accuracy

Limiting Factor

Relative astrometry-within an image

0.25 pixels

Small scale distortion stability

Absolute photometry

15%

Instrument stability and calibration

Relative photometry within an image

10%

Flat fields/external illumination



Target Acquisition Accuracies

Attribute

Accuracy

Limiting Factor

Guide star acquisition

1-2"

Catalog uncertainties

Following target acquisition exposure

0.2"

Centering accuracy plus plate scale accuracy to convert pixels to arcsecond

Following peakup acquisition exposure

30% of the slit width

Number of steps in scan + PSF



[Top] [Prev] [Next] [Bottom]

stevens@stsci.edu
Copyright © 1997, Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy. All rights reserved. Last updated: 11/13/97 17:47:03