Plot 1 scores: 8|
data source:	giraffe_simlamp (QC1 database)
dataset:	flux	•
median:	783	counts/sec
fixed thresholds:	500...1800	counts/sec
N_data plotted:	97
[click plot for closeup]

Plot 2 scores: 8|
data source:	giraffe_simlamp (QC1 database)
dataset:	flux	•
median:	944	counts/sec
fixed thresholds:	500...1880	counts/sec
N_data plotted:	86
[click plot for closeup]

Plot 3 scores: 8|
data source:	giraffe_simlamp (QC1 database)
dataset:	flux	•
median:	556	counts/sec
fixed thresholds:	200...1000	counts/sec
N_data plotted:	85
[click plot for closeup]

Plot 4 scores: 7|
data source:	giraffe_simlamp (QC1 database)
dataset:	flux	•
median:	300	counts/sec
fixed thresholds:	200...1000	counts/sec
N_data plotted:	84
[click plot for closeup]

Plot 5 scores: 8|
data source:	giraffe_simlamp (QC1 database)
dataset:	flux	•
median:	625	counts/sec
fixed thresholds:	200...1000	counts/sec
N_data plotted:	86
[click plot for closeup]

This is the trending plot monitoring the stability of the GIRAFFE SIMCAL arclamp and the 5 fibre systems. These data are derived from the daily SIMLAMP,TAL health check measurements (5 with the HR grating, H525.8B setting; one with the LR grating, L543.1).

Plots 1-5. For each of the five fibre systems (in H525.8B setting), an emission line is selected, its intensity is integrated and divided by the EXPTIME. The resulting flux, in counts/sec, is trended over time.

Plot 6: The same is done for the Medusa1 L543.1 setting.

If a certain trend effect is visible in *all* slits, it is likely to be caused by the lamp. If it shows up in one fibre system only, it originates in that particular fibre system.