This page provides information about
pipeline processing and data types.
Raw data are selected, associated and inserted into a reduction mechanism
which produces calibration products, science products and quality control
information. This mechanism is the data processing pipeline. There is one such pipeline for each VLT and VLTI instrument.
Find general information about ESO reduction pipelines here.
FUNCTIONALITIES
The main functionalities of the pipelines
are:
create master calibration data,
reduce science frames,
extract QC information from the data.
QC Garching creates
master calibration
data from raw calibration data, both for Visitor Mode and Service
Mode runs . The raw data are stored in the ESO Archive and are
public. They are assessed and selected in terms of their quality and
used for QC checks and for trending;
reduced science data
(currently only for Service Mode runs) . For SM programmes, QC Garching runs
the pipeline on all science raw data, using the best available, quality-checked
master calibration data.
Science data are processed by the pipeline
with the best available calibration data. Please note that ESO is not
assuming any responsibility in respect to the usefulness of the reduced
data. The adopted reduction strategy may not be suitable for the scientific
purpose of the observations.
OPERATIONS
There are two instances of the data reduction pipelines:
at the instrument workstation on Paranal, running in automatic mode,
at HQ Garching, run by the Quality Control Group in the optimized
mode.
The automatic mode is used for quick look purposes and for on-site
quality control. It processes all raw data sequentially, as they arrive
from the instrument. If calibration products ("master calibrations") are required for processing science data, these are taken from a database with standard, pre-manufactured
calibration products. The automatic mode is not tuned to obtain the best possible
results.
The optimized mode is the mode, which uses all data of a night,
including the daytime calibrations. The calibration data are sorted and
grouped according to their dependencies. Master calibration data are created.
Their quality is checked. The certified, closest-in-time products are
finally associated to the science data of a night. This is the way all
calibration data in supported modes are processed by QC Garching, as
are all science data from Service Mode programmes.
Raw data. HAWK-I
has a 2x2 mosaic of 4 2048x2048 photon-sensitive pixels.
There are NO pre- or post- overscan columns or rows.
Further details regarding the chips can be found in Appendix B
of the
User Manual.
In total, HAWK-I raw frames have 4096x4096
pixels.
There is only one read-mode available, which is unbinned, un-correlated.
Raw frames have a size of 65MB each. Find example (reference)
frames here.
Extensions. Raw
data come as FITS files with FIVE HDUs (header units),
so-called Multi-Extension FITS files, or MEFs.
The primary HDU has the header with all primary keywords
and telescope, positioner, detector, observation, instrument
etc. keywords.
The pixel data, plus chip-specific header info for each of the
FOUR chips are then stored in four further HDUs.
Products.
Pipeline products are either FITS images or FITS tables, and
either have a single HDU (i.e. traditional FITS files) or 5
HDUs as for the RAW data, i.e. a primary HDU containing the header
with all primary keywords and telescope, positioner, detector,
observation, instrument etc. keywords and then pixel or table
data, plus chip-specific header info for each of the
FOUR chips in four further HDUs.
Further info can be found
here.
Since The beginning of HAWK-I operations
(April 2008), runs performed in Service Mode receive a set of
DVDs containing:
all raw science data,
reduced science data (if applicable),
associated calibration products,
associated raw calibration data,
listings and logs,
QC reports and OB reports.
ACTUAL
PROBLEMS AND ISSUES
3Gb Limit:
32bit Linux systems, as used by the ESO Quality Control
Group, have a fundamental limit to the amount of memory that
any single process can address at one time. This has the
impact on HAWK-I data procecssing that for data processed
with pipeline version 1.3.4 and earlier stacks of more than
about 70 frames can not be handled. Therefore, for the
purpose of QC, only the first 70 frames of stacks with more
than 70 frames are used to create pipeline products.
Once identified the pipeline memory handling was improved to
enable handling of stacks of up to approximately 135 frames,
resulting in version 1.3.5.
This limit should disappear if a 64bit architecture is used,
but this has NOT be verified in this case and thus for the
moment remains pure speculation.
See, for example:
Imperfect telescope offsets:
For the purposesof QC in P81, SCIENCE frames reduced by the pipeline
without using the --refine command line option of the
hawki_img_jitter recipe.
Without the --refine command line option, the pipeline uses
the offsets recorded in the headers of each RAW frame in the stack for
shifting each frame onto a common reference. With the --refine
command line option, the pipeline uses the offsets recorded in the
headers of each RAW frame in the stack as a first guess, but refines
these guesses by making a fit to a single object in the central region
of the chip for shifting each frame onto
a common reference.
As a result two effects are seen:
Non-circular Image Quality:
The image quality measured in the PRO.CATG=COMBINED products is
generally slightly non-circular. This is currently believed to be due
to imperfect offseting of the telescope, i.e. the telescope does not
perfectly achieve the requested offsets.
Double images:
Occassionally the pipeline produces PRODUCTs with double (or
even multiple) images of each object. This is believed to be due to
glitches in the telescope offseting, meaning that the telescope does
makes an offset significantly different from that requested (and thus
recorded in the frame headers) of it.
Both of these problems are resolved simply by re-reducing using the
--refine command line option.
Bugs in the ZPOINT recipe prior to version 1.4.2:
HAWK-I ZPOINTs are measured by observing single standard stars. The
star is observed four times in each filter, placing the star at the
center of each chip in turn. The OB should be created as follows:
Acquistion Template: Preset the telescope
Observing Template: offset the telescope to the first chip and then make an exposure
Observing Template: offset the telescope to the second chip and then make an exposure
Observing Template: offset the telescope to the third chip and then make an exposure
Observing Template: offset the telescope to the fourth chip and then make an exposure
done
The pipeline does not care in which order the chips are exposed, it
uses the offsets for each exposure to work out which chip has the star
in each exposure. This works as long as the offsets for each exposure
are not 0,0. This was the case for some of the first created standard
star OBs which included an acquisition offset to place the star at the
center of one ofthechips before starting the observing template.
From version 1.4.2, this problem is circumvented by simply subtracting
the mean offset of the four offsets in each direction from each
individual offset.
There is still a strong possibility of mis-identifying the standard
star if for some reason (e.g. the inter-chip gaps were forgotten
about when the offsets were calculated) the standard star is not very
close to the center of each chip. This will be avoided in a future
version by using the WCS info in the image headers to locate the
standard star rather than simply assuming it is at the center of the
chips.
Finally assuming the four exposures were correctly identified, and the
standard star was correctly identified there was, prior to version
1.4.2 still another bug which meant that irrespective of which chip
they came from, the results for the first frame in the sequence were
written into the header of the first extension of the product which is
(usually, but not necessarily always) CHIP 1, the
results for the second frame in the sequence were written into the
header of the second extension of the product which is
(usually, but not necessarily always) CHIP 2 and so on... This has
been fixed in version 1.4.2.
The QC1 database entries are thus in general not properly sorted
according to chip (though obviously the mean and RMS values are
correct). Once the version which will use the WCS coordinates to find
the standard star is available, the historic data will be reprocessed
in order to fix the QC1 database values, however the MASTER frames in
the calibration database with incorrect information in their headers
will NOT be fixed.