QC documentation system: QC procedure vimos_sciifu.py for VIMOS

This documentation is intended both for QC scientists and SciOps astronomers (who may want to ignore the technical information displayed in grey).   HOME   CRIRES FORS1 FORS2 KMOS NACO   GIRAFFE UVES XSHOOTER   ISAAC SPHERE VIMOS VISIR   HAWKI MUSE SINFONI   AMBER MIDI PIONIER   OMEGACAM VIRCAM [best viewing with style sheets and javascript enabled] vimos_bias.py vimos_dark.py vimos_detlin.py vimos_mask2ccd.py vimos_imgskyflt.py vimos_imgscrflt.py vimos_astimg.py vimos_stdimg.py vimos_nightzp.py vimos_moscal.py vimos_stdmos.py vimos_ifucal.py vimos_stdifu.py vimos_sciimg.py vimos_scimos.py vimos_sciifu.py   bottom  plots   |   contact NAME vimos_sciifu.py VERSION 1.0 -- copied from vimos_stdifu.py (December 2009/February 2010) 1.0.1 -- bug fix in case of empty MASSOC list (2010-09-14) 1.0.2 -- skip call of scoreQC (2011-05-31) 1.0.3 -- create cover sheet (2011-09-01) SYNTAX PYTHON CALL processQC from $DFS_PRODUCT/STD_IFU/$DATE /home/vimos/python/vimos_ifusci.py -i -a $AB INSTRUMENT VIMOS RAWTYPE SCI_IFU PURPOSE QC check of IFU science products PROCINPUT products: IFU_SCIENCE_REDUCED, IFU_FOV static: GRISM_TABLE QC1TABLE trending | table(s) in QC1 database: vimos_ifu_sci TRENDPLOT trending | HealthCheck plot associated to this procedure: none QC1PAGE trending | associated documentation: none QC1PLOTS top sciifu1.png upper panels: extracted spectra for three fibres lower left panels: details of sky spectrum with comparison to nominal wavelengths of sky lines lower right panel: reconstructed field of view; combined image for all 4 quadrants sciifu2.png upper panel: IFU_SCIENCE_REDUCED, 2D image of all fibre spectra lower panel: IFU_SCIENCE_REDUCED, detail of central area QC1PARAM QC1 parameters written in QC1 database: ids_rms | num_lost_total ALGORITHM Description of algorithms: ids_rms: rms of dispersion solution, taken from calibration num_lost_total: total number of fibres that could not be calibrated CERTIF Reasons for notes in GEN_INFO/NOTES.txt: IFU image not well reconstructed (zigzag pattern); not well wavelength-calibrated, i.e. skylines at wrong positions COMMENTS NONE top [2016-03-11T12:31:33]         created by qcDocu v1.1.2, a tqs tool