[ ESO ]  

Astroclimatology of Paranal

HOME INDEX SEARCH HELP NEWS

Raw large   Raw small   Monthly means large   Monthly means small   Monthly statistics   Annual Plots ( 2002 large@30m   2002 large@20m   2002 small@30m   2002 small@20m   2003 large@30m   2003 large@20m   2003 small@30m   2003 small@20m)   92-93 small vert. profile   92-93 small@20m   Bibliography

Atmospheric Extinction at Paranal

Patat F, Moehler S, OBrien K, Pompei E, Bensby T, Carraro G, Korhonen H (2011) Optical atmospheric extinction over Cerro Paranal. Astron Astrophys 527:A91

Monitoring airborne aerosols at Paranal

R4815 Met One Particle Counters (PDF datasheet) are part of the Astronomical Site Monitor instrumentation. Two identical sensors were installed in May 1998 respectively 30m and 20m above ground at the northern edge of the summit. After an upgrade of the pumping system, the sensors were successfully cross-checked with a CLIMET (CI-8060) particle counter and the database is considered consistent starting in September 2001. However, since that date, construction work of the nearby VST telescope might have occasionally contaminated the data. Two ranges of particle size are considered in what follows, the large with diameter larger than 5 micron and the small with diameter larger than 0.5 micron. The ESO database can be queried from the Ambient Conditions server.

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 5 micron: Chronological Distribution at 30m (black) and 20m (red)


Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 0.5 micron: Chronological Distribution at 30m (black) and 20m (red)



Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 5 micron: monthly averages at 30m (black) and 20m (red)


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 0.5 micron: monthly averages at 30m (black) and 20m (red)



Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal: Annual Statistics


Average Aerosol Density (per cubic meter): large@30m/large@20m/small@30m/small@20m
2002 2003
January 2667/1337/925014/155730 636/1954/130566/125221
February 1044/2634/839474/1858435
March 788/1788/884329/3658111
April 570/965/386915/1536022
May 1468/616/363440/583169
June 368/834/189179/344316
July 2080/6891/1614493/579925
August 1097/1500/374232/512734
September NN/NN/NN/NN
October NN/NN/NN/NN
November 232/874/63639/43494
December 436/1480/121908/175698
Year 1049/1746/591623/947180
Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 5 micron: Chronological Distribution 2002 at 30m


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 5 micron: Chronological Distribution 2002 at 20m


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 0.5 micron: Chronological Distribution 2002 at 30m


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 0.5 micron: Chronological Distribution 2002 at 20m


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 5 micron: Chronological Distribution 2003 at 30m


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 5 micron: Chronological Distribution 2003 at 20m


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 0.5 micron: Chronological Distribution 2003 at 30m


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal, diameter > 0.5 micron: Chronological Distribution 2003 at 20m


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal: 1-10m Vertical Profile 1992-1993

A CLIMET (CI-8060) airborne particle counter has been operated for seven months from Dec. 92 to May 93 at Paranal. The device counts particles at six ranges (0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 1.0, 5.0 and 10 micron) simultaneously. An analysis of the height distribution of particles larger than 0.5 micron over 6 levels from 1 to 10m above ground is presented on the figure below, out of 3000 samples of 10 minutes each, taken at night from February to May 1993. A 40% increase is seen at ground level during events with the lowest aerosol concentration in which cases locally produced contamination is prevailing. With increasing particle concentration, the effect of height becomes marginal showing that the site is then in free air conditions: it can be seen on the plot that during events with median to high concentration, the increase of aerosol density is negligible from 10 to 5m and of the order of only 10% from 5m to 1m above ground.
Compared to the standard definition of indoor cleanliness in use in industry, the site is better than class 30,000 for particles larger than 1 micron and around class 100,000 for sizes down to 0.3 micron.


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal: Chronological Distribution 1992-1993

As can be seen on the figure below, the density of particles of diameter larger than 0.5 micron, measured at 10m above ground over 20mn averages, shows very large variations with a time constant of several days. The theory says that particles of diameter between 0.5 and 1 micron, when carried aloft with the wind, fall 1m in a time varying from days to one hour, which means that the aerosol content measured in the Paranal area is affected by sources located up to several hundred kilometers away. In this range of size one may find human made (mines) as well as natural (pollen, bacteria, sea salt) aerosols. It is most probable that whirlwinds, a thermal phenomenon particular to the desert areas, are mainly responsible for the noticeable increase of Paranal particles density during the warmer (and more humid) summer months.


Back to top

Airborne aerosols at Paranal: Bibliography

94a
P. Giordano, M. Sarazin; Survey of airborne particle density and the ageing of mirror coatings in the open air at the V L T Observatory; SPIE, Vol. 2199, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation for the 21st Century, Kona, Hawaii (USA), 13-18 March 1994.

 [General Facilities]  [ESO  Astroclimatology]  [ESO]  [Index]  [Search]  [Help]  [News]