Efficiency
Theoretically
Table 2.2 of the original FEROS
Design Report, tabulates the individual, theoretical efficiencies
of each component of FEROS as well as the overall Instrumental
efficiency. That tableis reproduced here in columns 1-8.
| WL |
Fibres |
Mirrors |
Echelle |
Cross Disperser |
Camera |
CCD |
Total Instrument |
Aluminium Relectivity |
Total Inst'+Tel' |
| (350) |
0.50 |
0.24 |
0.73 |
0.55 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.017 | 0.82 | 0.011 |
| 370 |
0.52 |
0.52 |
0.73 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.58 | 0.07 | 0.835 | 0.049 |
| 400 |
0.56 |
0.92 |
0.73 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.21 | 0.85 | 0.152 |
| 450 |
0.57 |
0.94 |
0.73 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.26 | 0.86 | 0.192 |
| 500 |
0.58 |
0.96 |
0.73 | 0.91 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.27 | 0.87 | 0.204 |
| 600 |
0.59 |
0.94 |
0.73 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.26 | 0.89 | 0.206 |
| 700 |
0.60 |
0.94 |
0.73 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.24 | 0.87 | 0.182 |
| 800 |
0.60 |
0.92 |
0.73 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.85 | 0.116 |
| 900 |
0.60 |
0.92 |
0.73 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.89 | 0.063 |
The column for the reflectivity of Aluminium from taken from Allen
C.W., Astrophysical Quantities, 3rd ed. pg. 108 (with linear
interpolation as required). The column Total Inst'+Tel' is derived from
Total Instrument times the reflectivity of Aluminium squared
representing two reflections (M1 + M2).
Empirically
A slightly modified version of the FEROS MIDAS efficiency.prg script included in the standard ESO-MIDAS distribution is used for calculating the efficiency of Instrument+Telescope using observations of SpectroPhotometric Standard stars.A critical factor in this calculation is the Effective Area of
the telescope, which here we define as the actual imaging surface,
i.e. the area of M1 minus the area of M2 occulting the beam. For the
ESO-1.52m the Effective Area calculated thus (assuming dia[M1] = 1.524m
and dia[M2] = 0.432m) is 1.678 square meters. For the MPG/ESO-2.20m the
Effective Area calculated thus (assuming dia[M1] = 2.200m and dia[M2] =
0.887m) is 3.183 square meters. Hense assuming the same instrument
efficiency and efficiency of the mirrors of the two respective
telescopes, the throughput of the 2.20m should be a factor of 1.897
greater.
In practice, the Effective Area used in the efficiency.prg script for
the 1.52m is 1.5 square meters. This is probably due to either the
actual imaging area of M1 being slightly smaller than 1.524m, or the
occultation by M2 being slightly larger than 0.432m, or a combination
of the two.
Empirical measurements of the efficiency of FEROS+2.20m are made
according to the FEROS Calibration Plan every night when
FEROS OBs are are executed (both Visitor & Service Mode) and are
plotted in the graphic below. The blue line represents the theoretical
expectation tabulated above.
Historical empirical measurements of the efficiency of FEROS+1.52m can be found here.
