mirror sites: PL (internal link) HQ     [?]

Quality Control and
Data Processing


CAL | HC | refs | QC
QUALITY CONTROL
    HOME
UVES QC
   Detector: monitoring
Pipeline
Solar&sky spectra
QC links:
UVES: Detector monitoring
DARK parameters | Linearity-Gain parameters

 
HC PLOTS
DARK
linearity
gain
duty_cycle
QC1 database (advanced users): browse | plot

The detector trending is based on the measurement of QC1 parameters of DARK and Detector Linearity data. It is obtained with dedicated Health Check OBs executed approximately monthly.

The DARK OBs obtain 4 sets of DARK data, 2 sets in BLUE mode and 2 sets in RED mode, each set comprising three 3600 second RAW frames. The 2 sets in each mode are acquired in the two main CCD ReadOut modes; 225kHz, low gain, 1x1 binning amd 50kHz, high gain, 2x2 binning.

The Detector Linearity OBs obtain 4 sets of BIAS and Imaging Flat Field data, 2 sets in BLUE mode and 2 sets in RED mode, each set comprising five BIAS RAW frames and ten pairs of Flats with exposures times for each pair selected to sample the full well potential of the detector. The 2 sets in each mode are acquired in the two main CCD ReadOut modes; 225kHz, low gain, 1x1 binning amd 50kHz, high gain, 2x2 binning.

These data thus give detailed charateristics for all THREE UVES CCDs, one BLUE and two RED (UPPER and LOWER).


DARK parameters
DARK parameters | Linearity-Gain parameters

QC1_parameters

FITS key QC1 database: table, name definition class* HC_plot** more docu
[calculated by QC procedure] uves_dark..current_dark mean_dark, normalized to 3600 secs exposure time HC [docuSys coming]
[calculated by QC procedure] uves_dark..mean_raw mean value of raw frame CAL [docuSys coming]
[calculated by QC procedure] uves_dark..mean_dark mean value across master dark CAL [docuSys coming]
*Class: KPI - instrument performance; HC - instrument health; CAL - calibration quality; ENG - engineering parameter
**There might be more than one.

Trending

Montage of the different QC reports

  • box1: comparison of master DARK (red) <-> raw DARK (black) <-> master BIAS (green); upper panel: middle row and middle column, full pixel range, in ADU; lower panel: middle row and middle column, central 100 pixels, in ADU
  • box 2: histogram: all pixel values in log frequency histogram; raw DARK: black, master BIAS: green; there should be a dominant peak with Gaussian shape (which translates to parabola shape in this log freq diagram)
  • box 3: histogram: log frequency histogram; master DARK: red; upper panel: all pixel values, there should be a dominant peak with Gaussian shape (which translates to parabola shape in this log freq diagram); lower panel: closeup arount zero where the mean DARK current is expected to be close to
  • top panel: name of analyzed master DARK frame and name of the master BIAS frame used for comparison (and by the pipeline)
  • bottom panel: some template properties and QC1 parameters

    These frames are taken approximately once per month, as a set of 3 consecutive exposures of 3600 secs each. These data are de-biased and combined into a MASTER_DARK, in which the average dark level is measured (in ADU/px/hr).

    You can also see here basic QC parameters related to detector properties (like median level, ReadOut Noise, etc).

    Scoring&thresholds DARK parameters

    The thresholds are set as an offset around the median. The user manual gives an indication of the values. These are given in e-/pix/h (ADU/pix/h) at -120C:

    1. BLUE Chip: 0.4 (lg: 0.22, hg: 0.74)
    2. RED CHIPL: 0.5 (lg: 0.31, hg: 0.96)
    3. RED CHIPU: 1.5 (lg: 1.03, hg: 2.88)

    History

    The trending of the DARK during the life time of the instrument is best be seen with the full history DARK trending plots shown here: FULL DARK history.

    Algorithm DARK parameters

    All the parameters are calculated by a QC script


    Linearity-Gain parameters
    DARK parameters | Linearity-Gain parameters

    QC1_parameters

    FITS key QC1 database: table, name definition class* HC_plot** more docu
    QC.GAIN uves_lingain..gain GAIN (see QC.METHOD) [ADU/el] HC [docuSys coming]
    QC.LIN.EFF uves_lingain..lin_eff Effective non-linearity correctionHC [docuSys coming]
    *Class: KPI - instrument performance; HC - instrument health; CAL - calibration quality; ENG - engineering parameter
    **There might be more than one.

    Trending

    These frames are taken approximately once per month, as a set of 25 consecutive exposures, 5 BIAS frames and 10 pairs of FLATs of varying exposure time and thus various signal level designed to sample the full dynamic range of the detector.

    Scoring&thresholds Linearity-Gain parameters

    Scoring thresholds have been set rather losely .

    History

    The trending of the LINEARITY during the life time of the instrument is best be seen with the full history LINEARITY trending plots shown here: FULL Linearity history.

    Algorithm Linearity-Gain parameters

    The recipe detmon_opt_lg is part of the detector monitoring recipes common to several VLT instruments. Frames ON are considered as FLAT and OFF as BIAS frames.

  • The ON frames are ordered by increasing DIT
  • The median of each frame is determined.
  • The fames with median flux over --filter are excluded from the computation.

    the QC.LIN_EFF parameter is the difference between the polynomial flux (3rd order) and the predicted linear fit at a user defined flux level (10000) normalized with the polynomial flux.


  • Send comments to <qc_uves@eso.org> powered by QC [webCMS v1.0.1]