|
|
LISA Manual
Friends
of LISA (FOL)
The purpose
of the Friends of LISA Committee is to raise funds from vendors, professional
societies, institutions, and individuals in order to help astronomy
librarians in resource-poor countries to attend LISA conferences. FOL
assists librarians by providing grants to cover part or all of the housing,
per diem, and, in some cases, travel expenses. Historically, FOL has
also assisted with registration fees. Donations to FOL benefit both
the librarians who would not otherwise be able to attend without financial
assistance, and the other meeting attendees who reap the rewards of
a richer and more diverse conference.
Overview/Tasks
Phase
One- Collecting funds
- one or more special
purpose bank accounts must be set up for receiving funds (be sure
to specify correct 'payable to' in letters and messages); see the
section about being treasurer
- FOL requested 4500-5000
from SLA Board each year but only received 2000 for FOL III and
none for FOL IV. We did receive money from the SLA Endowment fund
for III and IV- the double grant for III was before the roles of
the two granting bodies (Board/Endowment fund) were clearly delineated.
Note that there are specific deadlines for these applications- make
sure to check out what they are, early.
- letters are sent to
vendors; see FOL IV sample letter and chart for suggestions; these
letters should be sent out at least 9 months before the meeting;
if any committee member has a connection with a vendor, by all means
use that contact
- a message soliciting
funds from individuals is sent out on PAMnet- see example (different
from above)
- a webpage (and spreadsheet)
are set up to keep track of donations; you must restrict
access to these
- note that fiscal year-end
(which varies) may affect the ability of companies to donate, either
positively (there's money left over to spend) or negatively (there's
no money left); that's a good reason to leave lots of time for donors
- personal thank you
notes should be sent to all donors, both institutional and individual,
and of course a list of sponsors must appear in the conference materials
(including 'anonymous', if any)
Phase
Two- Collecting and deciding about applications
- a message is sent out
soliciting applications; this message must be sent out about 5-6
months ahead of the meeting to allow lots of time
for attendees to get visas etc.
- In this message,
include:
- note of any other
kind of funding possibilities (e.g. reciprocal agreements among
institutions; grants available from governments or special boards
etc.)
- deadline for applications,
date by which grant announcements will be made (this latter
should be a few weeks, at least, before the registration deadline)
- in the application
form (which goes out with the message) request the
following information:
- name, address, institution,
email, telephone and fax numbers, position held in the institution
and how long there, type of assistance needed (housing, travel,
per diem, registration fee), any assistance received from employer
or other institution - if so - what assistance
- you could ask for
banking information for those requesting travel assistance here,
or you could wait the acceptance letter as being more efficient
- we had problems
in 2002 with a couple of FOL grantees retiring and leaving the
field immediately after the conference- you should consider
adding a question about to the application form somehow; note
also the senior/junior criterion listed below- this might help
avoid this problem somewhat (e.g. "If you expect to retire or
leave your institution within one year of the date of the conference,
please give US this information.")
- see FOL IV sample
message/application form
- Note that there are
all kinds of bureaucratic problems, e.g. visas, that participants
encounter and a lot of time can be necessary for resolving and processing
them. Visa applications usually require a special
letter from the FOL or SOC specifying the conference details.
- we, through the LOC,
try to arrange some kind of cheap accomodation for our grantees,
e.g. a dormitory
- our criteria for selection
- the applicant should
be a librarian (we don't say that in the message though); there
are some astronomers who act as librarians- we count those as
librarians for our purposes
- the librarian should
be from an astronomy institution (but keep an open mind here-
one of our applicants appeared to be from an educational institution
which did not offer astronomy, but upon further inquiry we learned
that they were developing an astronomy programme)
- the applicant should
be from a developing country (sometimes we have offered the registration
fee to others)
- broad geographical
distribution
- consideration should
be given to the balance between senior librarians/previous grantees
who can mentor others and new, inexperienced librarians who perhaps
stand to gain more from the conference
- we have on a few occasions
given grants to people from non-developing countries if we had
money left after funding appropriate applicants from developing
countries. In most of these cases we have offered to pay the registration
fee or to pay a flat amount of a few hundred dollars, and the
applicants were then able to use our support to leverage additional
support from their respective home institutions.
- the funds are not necessarily
distributed evenly amongst the candidates. Some candidates will
be able to get transport from their institutions but not lodging
etc. A spreadsheet/webpage was set up with a row for each applicant
(whether granted funds or not- you might want this info later when
revisiting total funds available) and columns showing requested
amounts and funds granted -everything to some; registration, per
diem, lodging to some; registration only to some; and nothing to
some, depending on the criteria used; the amount available and the
applicants needs. This page had columns for other funding received,
acknowlegement/commitment from candidate etc. See sample
and real spreadsheets (latter is available only on request). Note
that these spreadsheets (and the donor one) should not be mounted
on the web in a manner that makes them publically accessible (findable
by web browsers); there are several ways to restrict
access to web files.
Phase
Three- Communicating with grantees/ keeping track
- when you are satisfied
with the potential distribution (and before the grant announcement
deadline, previously set and announced by the committee) letters
are sent to all applicants; examples are here (yes,
no, no,
but...) and a template is used but the yes letters do need to
be customized for each person, with exact amounts etc. We divided
this task alphabetically by grantee and then each FOL person had
a little group to follow up with, etc. It is best to have the same
person do all corresponding with those individuals in her/his group.
Be very careful exactly what you say- specify the
number of days of support, that per diem will be given out in the
local currency; the exact travel fare amount etc. Use simple language.
Try not to raise false expectations. If travel funds are to be granted,
ask for the best way to transfer the travel funds, e.g. is the individual
able to pay the fare now, with reimbursement later? (See treasurers'
section.) Indicate that a receipt (showing amount) for airfare
will be required at the meeting regardless of method of transfer.
Request acknowledgement of acceptance.
- as acknowledgements
come in, a separate section on the spreadsheet/webpage is developed
for 'committed' funds; another section is set up for roommates,
if the dorm rooms are double (see the bottom part of the applicants
chart)
- usually
a letter of invitation is required for obtaining
visas etc.; these can be sent out by FOL on LISA letterhead (make
up a letterhead) but may also be sent out by the SOC. (If they are
doing it, make sure the SOC recognizes the importance of getting
these letters out in a timely manner as visas can take a long time
to process. For this reason it might be better for FOL to do it.)
Only one or the other is required. It is important that the exact
funding to be provided (e.g. not just 'lodging' but 'lodging for
5 days' etc.) be stated along with the dates of the conference
- as soon as you know
that you will be wiring funds to someone, start trying to get their
bank info from them; don't wait until you're ready to send-
it is difficult and time consuming to extract this info from the
grantees
- when the travel funds
have been sent, let the grantee know and request acknowledgement
that they've been received
Phase
Four - Being the treasurer and distributing funds
- one or more special
purpose bank accounts must be set up; factors to consider when choosing
a bank are:
- the cost of wire
transfers (domestic and foreign)
- whether a bank does
much international business or has an international 'partner'
- whether you can keep
foreign currency in that bank; you might want a separate bank
account for Euros, for example
- note that the hosting
institution might be willing to serve some or all of this function
but check what they intend to charge and how easy it will be to
deal with them (deposits, withdrawals, transfers, etc.); it is
probably not desirable to rely on this and we never have
- find out exactly what
information your bank requires in order to make a transfer (minimum
and ideal)
- a portion of the funds
are transferred to the host country/institution in various ways;
wired, ATM etc.
- per diem funds are distributed
in cash, in local currency, on site, at registration (be aware that
if hard currency is distributed it will be taken back to the grantee's
country and not used for the purpose intended)
- lodging is paid for
directly by FOL to the dorm or whatever
- likewise registration
is paid directly by FOL; sometimes some registrations are waived
by the LOC/SOC depending on their financial situation
- travel
funds are handled in various ways- wired to the individual
or to the individual's institution (note that some institutions
are as likely to confiscate some or all of the funds as are individuals;
some claim some portion of such grants for 'overhead'; check with
candidate); handed over in cash onsite (in US$, Euros, or some other
hard currency- make sure that receipts are provided); each of these
methods has advantages and disadvantages
- grantees often will
not be able to pay for their travel without the FOL funds in hand
- sometimes the institution
(or grantees family etc.) will advance the funds, to be repaid
later by grantee
- large amounts of cash
given to the attendees makes it vulnerable to loss/theft; if you
do this, give it to them on the last day (keeping it safe in the
meantime), warn them about mugging etc.; this might be true of
the per diem too- must it all be carried at all time?
- interim reports and
a final summary report is provided to the whole FOL committee; tips
on reports:
- keep separate columns
in your spreadsheet for different currencies; that way the exchange
rate used to determine balances can be changed easily as time
goes by
- report in the currencies
in which the funds are held; e.g. "we have xx US$ and nn Euros"
- be aware that the
exact amount of funds available will vary over time depending
on the exchange rate
- apart from currency
rates, currency conversion fees vary and can be complicated; for
example at LISA IV our US funds were transferred into Euros before
being transferred into Czech karunas and we paid fees accordingly
(at each transfer); allow a slush amount for such fees and for currency
fluctuations
- resist the temptation
to allow the host institution to keep any leftover FOL funds pending
the next meeting; corporate memories are short and we have had a
bit of trouble extracting such funds, when we tried that (sometimes
leftover fund meetings have been donated to the next FOL fund)
- keep some of the leftover
available in hand for emergencies etc. At LISA IV we had one person
lose her purse and another mugged and we were fortunate enough to
be able to help out with extra cash. Leftover funds can also be
distributed to people who were not initially granted full funding-
a bonus for which they are very grateful
- leftover FOL funds for
seeding the next meeting can be kept by the current treasurer or
by PAM. If PAM does hold the funds, there should be a letter from
the PAM
treasurer documenting the amount held.
Phase
Five - Aftermath
Usually a report
is written up for SLA publication(s). Last time one was written up for
IAU commission 46 newsletter. (Consider also the IAU Commission 5 Newsletter
for a report.) Various other local ones may be appropriate. It's good
to publicize!
More- General
Reports, Reports
to Funding Agencies
Privacy Issue
The committee
may be faced with a privacy/scholarly issue. The SOC may ask for a list
of grantees. There are two points of view on this issues. One of our
members (and a member of the POC) felt strongly that it was a violation
of the privacy rights of the individuals concerned and that the SOC
should make decisions based on merit alone; acceptance of a paper, even
if not presented, may boost the status of a librarian at her/his institution.
Furthermore, it is feasible to present a poster paper (or even an oral
paper) in absentia. The counter-argument, of course, is that programme
planning will be made more difficult and time consuming if papers are
accepted and then withdrawn because the individual cannnot actually
attend the meeting. Furthermore, the SOC could surmise who had received
grants anyway. You may have to decide among these two (or more, unarticulated
here) positions. (If the info is shared, it should be only with the
SOC Chairs, not the whole committee.)
Note that, especially
at LISA IV, almost every FOL person who gave a paper thanked us publicly
during their speech, so they clearly had no problem with people knowing
they'd received traval grants.
Related Documents
/ Samples
History
Appendix
A. Restricting access to web files
There are several
ways to restrict access to web pages. If you put the files in question
into a separate subdirectory, that subdirectory can be specified as
no-access in the server robots.txt. Note that this does not actually
restrict access but just ensures that complying search engines do not
index those pages.
Password access
could be set up.
Or, perhaps
simplest, an ".htaccess" file can be put into the same directory with
the restricted files. This .htaccess file disallows or allows access
as you specify. An example of text for such a file is below. Note that
the filename must begin with the . and that # indicates unexecuted comments.
<Limit GET>
# this file controls web access to files in this subdirectory
order deny,allow
deny from all
allow from .astro.utoronto.ca
allow from 128.100.75.95
# repeat above line with the ips of each of the FOL committee members; you
# may use domains or ips
</Limit>
Compiled
by Marlene Cummins with the help of the other members of the FOL committee
Ellen Bouton and Brenda Corbin (the committee was the same for FOL II,
III, IV).
Last update April 5 2004
|