Visit the ESO Paranal Observatory Visit the ESO La Silla Observatory Visit the ESO General Information and Services pages Visit the ESO Santiago Web Site
[ More info about ESO ]          
MUSE Ground Layer Adaptive Optics


museao_vign  
Built by
ESO Adaptive Optics Department
External
Collaborations
Leiden Observatory (NOVA)
Project Manager
Norbert Hubin (nhubin@eso.org)
System Engineer
Stefan Stroebele (sstroebe@eso.org)
Instrument Scientist
Lucas Pasquini
Status
Conceptual Design Study completed
Telescope Location
VLT Nasmyth focus (UT to be defined) in 2011

Overview of the Adaptive Optics System for MUSE
General Concept
GLAO#1 Optical design
GLAO#2 Optical design
GLAO#1 & 2 Mechanical design
Multi-Laser Guide Star Top Level Requirements
Real-Time Computer and Software design
MUSE AO performance
References
MUSE AO project team

Overview of the Adaptive Optics System for MUSE

This Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (AO) aims at concentrating the energy of a Point Spread Function over a large FOV (1’) for a visible-light integral field spectrograph: Multi Unit Spectrographic Explorer (MUSE), a second generation instrument for the Very Large Telescope (VLT).

The prime goal of MUSE is to provide a deep 3D survey capability in the optical range at the VLT, especially for the detection of very distant (up to z~7) Lyman α emitters. Emphasis is put on getting a relatively wide field with a good sky sampling. Adaptive Optics system is to get significantly better energy concentration.

The baseline of the MUSE Ground Layer Adaptive Optics (GLAO) is to provide two modes of correction:
    •    Wide field of view mode (WFM): seeing reducer over a 1' FOV at 750nm with a factor 2 improvement in 0.2” ensquared energywith high sensitivity and high sky coverage
    •    Narrow Field of view mode (NFM): 5-10” FOV with 10% Strehl ratio at 650nm.

General Concept

Two AO concepts are investigated:
    •    GLAO#1 based on the availability/feasibility of an adaptive secondary at VLT
    •    GLAO#2 based on a more classical AO approach using relay optics and ~1k actuators deformable mirror.

Both concepts make use of 4 Laser Guide Star wavefront tomography and one deformable mirror conjugated to the ground. Commands are optimized to provide the best possible correction within the 1’ FOV in a so-called ground layer correction approach. Tip-tilt correction is performed either with an off-axis NGS in the visible (WFM) or an on-axis NGS in the NIR (NFM).

GLAO#1 and 2 have a number of design commonalities:
  1. GLAO correction for MUSE will be provided at the Nasmyth focus of one VLT
  2. Four reconfigurable Sodium Laser Guide Stars arranged in a square configuration and emitted from four 50 cm laser projectors located on the VLT centrepiece ring. The four lasers are emitted toward the centre of the scientific FOV such that to avoid Rayleigh scattered light crossing the visible scientific FOV
  3. Four rotating WFSs with automatic refocusing (80-180 km)
  4. For the Wide Field Mode the LGS are located at 60” off-axis. For the Narrow Field Mode the LGSs are located at 15” off-axis. 
  5. Faint visible (mv~19) Tip-Tilt Natural Guide star sensor patrolling a 3' FOV will provide tip-tilt correction for the Wide Field Mode.
  6. Faint NIR on-axis tip-tilt Natural Guide Star sensor will provide tip-tilt correction for the Narrow Field Mode.
muse_ao_concept     Muse_ao_diagram

GLAO #1 OPTICAL DESIGN

In GLAO#1,  the Adaptive Secondary provides a corrected F/15 beam, the LGS focusing of the WFSs is performed by 2 plates:
GLAO#1_WFS  GLAO#1_NFOV  

GLAO #2 OPTICAL DESIGN

In the GLAO#2 design, the AO relay optics is compatible with the implementation of two deformable mirrors (conjugated at 0 & 8 km) and one separate Tip-Tilt mirror. The ground layer deformable mirror diameter (pupil) is 180 mm. After the adaptor flange a total reflection prisms, with a pupil transfer lens glued on its entrance face, directs the light down through a hole on the optical bench. An AO optical relay is inserted between the adaptor flange and the Nasmyth focus. The collecting plate and the wavefront sensors have been moved outside the telescope beam and are now parallel to the optical bench.

GLAO2_prism   GLAO2_relay
The folding mirror (up) and the 8.5 km layer conjugate mirror define the vertical axis on the platform. After the optical relay system, operating at magnification one through a 3 lens system, the light reaches the new collecting plate which is again a lens with a focal length of 2.8m. A flat mirror located on the back of the prism is used to locate the focus given by the relay optics at the nominal Nasmyth focus. The focusing plate is identical to GLAO#1. The 4 wavefront sensors and the collecting plate have to rotate around a vertical axis to follow the telescope pupil rotation. The focusing plate is not rotating in the Wide Field Mode and is rotating in the case of the Narrow Field Mode. The wavefront sensors (for both GLAO#1 and #2) are Shack Hartmann with 32x32 subapertures.

GLAO #1 & 2 MECHANICAL DESIGN

 The systems consists of two parts called instrument structure 1 and 2. The AO instrument structure 1 is attached to the VLT Adapter rotator. In GLAO#1, the four WFSs are attached to a mechanical structure rotating with the adapter and the WFS detectors are mounted via an intermediate housing to the AO structure 1.
In GLAO#2, Structure 1 is not rotating and contains the relay optics, the deformable mirror conjugated at the ground, the tip-tilt mirror the AO focal plane calibration unit and the provision for a second deformable mirror. The tracking for the WFS Detectors is realized internally by a rotation stage.

The AO Structure 2 and the implemented subassemblies are similar for both concepts. The Focusing Plates, Calibration Plate and the MUSE Calibration Folding Mirror are located close to the Nasmyth focus. The acquisition camera and the IR tip-tilt sensor, including the pick up mirror unit are located after the Nasmyth focal plane. On axis a folding mirror, with a clear aperture for the scientific path redirects the light towards the NGS Guide Camera.

GLAO#1_mechanics  GLAO#2_mechanics

Multi- Laser Guide Star Top Level Requirements for MUSE-AO

Description 
Requirements
Remarks
Number of LGSs
4 CW Sodium LGSs (589 nm)

Location of emitters
Telescope centre piece; converging toward FOV
Rayleigh scattering in vis. science path
Return flux @ Nasmyth
2.5 106 Na photons/m2/s (goal 5 106)
Density of Na 2 1013m2
Maximum spot size
1.25” FWHM at 45 zenith angle    Seeing 0.8”

LGS pointing precision
1” goal 0.5”

Jitter control 
Refresh rate 1kHz, residual <50mas

REAL TIME COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE 

The Real-Time computer will receive a dataflow of four times 32x32 sub-apertures with 6x6 pixels (192x192 pixels). The Real-Time Computer of the MUSE-AO system is based on the ESO RTC platform concept.

In the WFOV mode, we take advantage of the reduced requirements for the final Strehl ratio and the fact that correcting for a large field-of-view implies a significant average of the measured slopes. Each WFS detector will be managed by a different controller and the output of the detector routed to a different computational board. Each of these boards will perform the classical operations of:
This parallel process completes in about 100µs. Data are then sent to the reconstruction module. The main design decision takes place at this point where the slopes computed independently for each sensor are then sent to the same back-end computational module where they are averaged and applied to a single small control matrix to project them into the mirror voltage space, thus saving a considerable amount of computing power.

As back-end the system features another board to collect all the data plus the information from the tip/tilt sensor to implement the controller and to control the deformable mirror. Another board receives all the data from the reconstructor to perform statistics. Optionally, it can also receive data from the control module if a PMC extender is used to add another link card. Without considering pipelining and considering a communication time of 100µs for each hop, the total computational time will be about 500µs. So a frame rate of 700Hz can be achieved with a load of 35% and 1.0 KHz can be achieved with a load of 50%.

In the NFOV mode we cannot average the slopes directly after their computation and we need to go through the complete reconstruction of the wavefront in each of the four sensors. We can do it in a modular way designing the system as the pipeline of the same acquisition module as proposed before plus one reconstructor dedicated to each sensor. A back-end stage collects the data from the 4 reconstructors to implement the controller. A statistical board is also present to compute statistics on the real-time data. To minimize the connections between the various boards a high degree of pipelining must be used.
MUSE and MUSE-AO Software design is an ESO standard architecture.

RTC_arch           MUSE_SW_arch

MUSE AO PERFORMANCE

Due to the rayleigh scattered light constrains, the LGSs are positioned 60’’ off-axis for the Wide FOV mode. For the Narrow FOV mode the 4 LGSs are located at 15" off-axis. Simulation parameters for both the wide and Narrow FOV are reported in the table below.

Parameters
Values WFOV mode
Values NFOV mode
Number of sub-apertures / LGSs
32x32 / 4
32x32 /4
LGS position & flux
60" off-axis / 150 ph/ sub-aperture / s
15" /350 ph/ sub-aperture / s
Frame rate & temporal delay
700 Hz/ 2 frames
700 Hz/ 2 frames
Loop gain
0.4
0.5
Tip-tilt NGS flux & Position
150 ph / sub-aperture / s / 75’’ off-axis
1000 ph / sub-aperture / s / on-axis
Wavelength
0.75 µm
0.75 µm
Seeing/ Tau0
1.1’’/ 3ms
0.65" / 3ms
Number of active actuators/ subapertures
881 /768
881/768

The performance of the Wide Field Mode is given as a function of pixel size on-axis and at 30“off-axis. The bottom curve provides the encircled energy of an uncorrected PSF. The WFOV AO system needs a suitable NGS for tip-tilt correction.With a Tip-tilt NGS limiting magnitude of 17.5 and a search FOV of 3’, more than 70% of selected deep fields can be observed

WFOV_perf     Sky_Cov
 
The Strehl ratio and FWHM performances of the Narrow Field Mode FWHM are shown as a function of wavelength. The instrumental error budget as well as LGS spot elongation and Na height variations have been neglected here (preliminary estimates are 80 nm rms equivalent to Sr(650) loss of 55 %). Tip-tilt measurement is done on-axis on the NIR counter part of the observed object.

NFOV_Sr   NFOV_FWHM

REFERENCES

  1. F. Henault, R. Bacon et al. MUSE, “a second generation integral field spectrograph for the VLT”, SPIE 5492, 2004
  2. M. Le Louarn, N. Hubin, “Wide-field adaptive optics for deep-field spectroscopy in the visible”, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 349, Issue 3, 2004.
  3. Le Louarn, N. Hubin, R. Arsenault, “Adaptive Optics for second generation VLT instruments” SPIE 5490, 2004
  4. R. Stuik et al.  , “generalised sky coverage for Adaptive Optics and interferometry”, SPIE 5490, 2004

MUSE AO Project team

Norbert Hubin
Project Manager
Norbert Hubin
Instrument Definition
Stefan Stroebele
System Engineer
Bernard Delabre
Optics
Ralf Conzelmann
Mechanics
Michel Duchateau
Electronics
Enrico Fedrigo
Real Time Control Software
Rob Donaldson
Instrument & control Software
Mark Downing
 Detector System
Sebastien Tordo
Assembly Integration and Testing
Jean Louis Lizon
Assembly Integration and Testing
Miska Le Louarn
Simulations







External Contribution to MUSE AO project
Remko Stuik
Leiden Observatory





Back to main AO page: