![]() |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEV44-82 CCDs Performance overview |
|||||
|
Best viewed with 1024x768 resolution
Oct/10/1999, C. Cavadore
Generality
The company EEV supplied ESO with many custom designed CCD called EEV44-82. This CCD has been used in many systems at ESO, such as WFI, VLTTC2, UVES, VIMOS, CES …
This device has 2 readout ports. The CCD can be operated either in dual readout mode using two ports, or single port readout. Binning along the X and Y direction is possible using any kind of binning factor provided that the scene is not oversatured. A fast wiping of the device can be achieved by using a dump gate close to the serial register.
This table summarizes main CCD geometrical dimension.
| EEV 44-82 | Full Frame / Frame transfer capable | |
| Type : Backside, Single layer AR | Pixel size 15x15 mm 100% photosensitive | |
| Number of photosensitive pixels | 2048 x 4102 [HxV] | Number of outputs : 2 |
| Size of the photosensitive area | 30.72 x 61.53 mm | |
| Horizontal pre-scan pixels | 50 | |
This device is 3 sides buttable. For each device, the theoretical non
sensitivity side area is 100 microns and the Left-Right gaps are 450 microns
each.

Noise
The following table shows noise performances achieved with FIERA at
different readout speeds and conversion factors (e-/ADU).
|
|
|||
|
(kps) |
(e-/ADU) |
|
(e- rms) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These noise figures may vary slightly according to the device used.
Quantum efficiency
EEV has optimized the QE to get good QE in the B and U bands. Nevertheless,
depending on the device, the QE in this range may vary slightly. The explanation
is the following: the Quantum Efficiency of these devices is strongly related
to of the thickness backside Anti-Reflection coating and this thickness
may vary according to the device (Hafnium Oxide 50nm). ESO measured 12
devices and used to achieve a statistic QE plot (figure A). This
is a criterion also to sort science grade devices : the best QE in the
blue (except for application requiring a higher red sensitivity).
figure A: Average QE of 12 devices, error bars shows the QE standard deviation from these 12 devices. Also the best blue sensitive device is plotted.
Fringing
Fringing is an issue for spectroscopic purposes. ODT has measured this
effect with 8 devices. The resulting parameter is called PRNU across the
chip (Photo-response non-uniformity). The near IR PRNU depends upon the
fringing effect. This effect is related to the thinning of the CCD, and
also to the aperture of the incoming beam, the more this beam is open,
the less the fringing is visible (figure B). In the blue part of
the spectrum the PRNU degrades also due to the backside p+ implementation
laser annealing. The images (figure C) show qualitatively these
effects. Figure C is a statistical analysis over 8 CCDs.
320nm
650nm
950nm
figure B : Flat fields from the same area at different wavelengths,
5nm bandwidth, parallel incoming beam, left 320nm, middle 650nm, right
950nm, F/2 beam.
300x300 pixels POSITIVE IMAGES
figure C: Average PRNU form 8 devices, error bars shows the PRNU standard deviation from these 8 devices, F/2 beam.
Cosmetic defects
The different kind of defects, which degrade the cosmetic quality of the device, can be split in three parts :
A defect is a pixel value above or below 5 sigmas from the mean
of the neighborhood pixels.
These defects are based upon the grading of the device, typically a
good science grade is one with less than 5 defective columns. The amount
of defects visible on long dark exposure is strongly related to the CCD
temperature. An operating CCD temperature of –120C is used to minimize
these effects.
Also the CCD device is made of 1024x512 blocks, and the area boundaries show sometime a 1% QE variation over 1 row/column due to photolithography stepper mismatches. These small defects flat-field out perfectly.
Trap defects are a determining factor for assigning devices to certain applications. These kind of defects cannot be suppressed because they are created during chip fabrication, and are not temperature dependant.
Finally, the amount of the "defects" induced by cosmic rays should not
be more than the one provided by natural radioactivity. The CCD package
and the head of the detector do not add additional hits. This value is
typically between 1 and 1.5 event/min/cm2.
Figure D, Median stacked of 1 hour exposure dark full frame of a
science grade device (CCD A for spectroscopy) at –120C, only 3 hot columns
are visible (overview of the entire device)
NEGATIVE IMAGE.
Figure E, Median stacked of 1 hour exposure dark frame of a medium
grade device (CCD B for direct imaging) at –120C, 8 hot columns are visible
(overview of the entire device)
NEGATIVE IMAGE.
Figure F, Low light level frame (2000e-): a 5 column wide trap is
visible here (overview of 1300x900 pixels). This device is rejected for
spectroscopic applications.
POSITIVE IMAGE
Charge transfer efficiency
ESO measurements shows horizontal CTE of 0.9999995 (six 9s, 5) and vertical CTE of 0.9999988 (almost six 9s). It means in the worst case : A pixel having 1000 electrons located on the opposite side to the readout port (X=2048, Y=4100) will lose 6 electrons, once the charge packet will reach the readout node (photon shot noise is about 31e- at that level).
Dark Current
EEV44-82 devices do not have MPP implant. The dark current is temperature
dependent as shown in figure G. The CCD must be cooled at a temperature
less than –95C for science purposes to achieve a dark current less and
equal to 10 e-/pixel/hour :
Figure G: Dark current versus temperature
|
|
(e-/pix/hour) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amplifier glowing
To avoid amplifier glowing, voltages less than 25 volts must be set to the VOD node of the chip.
Remanence effects
Remanence effects may occur if a flat field (Mean>10000e-) is taken
prior to the dark frame. The resulting effect resembles an increase of
dark current, especially at temperatures lower than 180K. ODT is currently
investigating to cure this problem. Figure H, shows a set of 24 dark frames
exposed each one-hour (CCD temperature : 160K). This set was taken after
the CCD was exposed to the ambient light. It requires four 1 hour darks
frames to eliminate of the remanence and to reach the actual dark current
value (about 5e-/pix/hour).
figure H: Remanence effect
figure Ha : oversaturated spot,
negative image
figure Hb : one hour dark exposure, just after Ha figure, binned
10x10, plus cosmic hits,
negative image
figure Hc : one hour dark exposure, just after Hb figure, binned
10x10, only the central spot is visible, negative image
Bright Star/bright spots remanent might be also visible when doing long
exposure afterward. Figure Ha shows an oversaturated star, with
intense vertical blooming. Figure Hb shows one hour dark exposure
taken just after at –120C. The blooming and central spot ghost are still
visible. If additional images are taken, it disappears after 4 hours.
From that study, It means that remanance has a global and local effects.
| T+1h | T+2h | T+3h | |
| Central Bulb remanent (e-) | 8 | 6 | 2 |
| Blooming remanent (e-) | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Linearity
By optimizing the voltages applied to the CCD readout amplifier, a good
linearity can be achieved in the range of 0-100Ke- without degrading
noise performance. The table below summarizes a typical linearity performance
from an EEV device at 225Kps.
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
(e-) |
||
|
|
|
||||
| Port A (left bottom) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Port B (right bottom) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Left and Right Port (225kps) | |||||
![]() |
|||||
Best performance is achieved with p-p linearity of ?
0.35%. Special voltage optimization is performed to get ?
0.5% at least across the full range.
Flatness
ODT has developed a special measurement device to acquire full chip
surface profile. A typical value is typically ?
6 microns at 150K, a maximum value is ? 10 microns
p-p.
figure I : Typical 3D plot of the CCD surface.
MTF
According to ODT’s latest measurements, the CCD shows no serious degradation
from the Nyquist curve. The very sharp hits resulting from the cosmic ray
impacts show that 95% of the energy released is within one pixel.

figure J : Cosmic rays hits (1 hour exposure), enlargement showing
4 cosmic rays hits
NEGATIVE IMAGE.
Binning eclipse effect on saturated stars
When using binning more than 1x1, a saturated star appears with a strange
black hole in the middle. The CCD output amplifier is, in this particular
state, completely out of range and behaves strangely. As there is, anyway,
no useful information in the center of a saturated star (no photometry/astrometry
feasible), this effect is more a cosmetic issue (which could be eliminated
by software) than scientific.
figure K : Eclipse effect on a saturated star with binning 2x2
POSITIVE IMAGE.
Blooming effect
To avoid loss of fill-factor, this CCD has not antiblooming implant.
This causes vertical trails over bright and saturated stars. The table
below gives a crude indication of the order of magnitude for point sources.
L1 denotes the number of pixels concerned toward the serial register, L2
the one in the opposite direction. Measurements made with binning 1x1.
| Direction |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| L1(pixels) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| L2(pixels) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross talk effect
This CCD allowing two port readout in the same time could exhibit cross
talk between two channels. It could be visible when a bright star is present
over the CCD. This effect has been measured at ESO. If an over saturated
bright spot is projected over one side of the CCD, ghost having an additional
fix level of 100 e- is visible on the other side, with the same shape of
the original bright spot. This is, for all imaging purposes, a negligible
effect.
figure L : Cross ta with a saturated star and 2 port readout
NEGATIVE IMAGE.
|
|
|||
|
|||